Good update, some nice fixes. Would've loved to see atleast one or two flightmodel or damagemodel fixes though. I hope the devs will have time for this in the coming months.
If you want that, provide Neoqb with concrete hard data. This impossible to correct something just by the feeling of some people that, "it is wrong".
I really don't want to go OT, but I don't know what hard data would anyone need to see what's wrong with this picture:
A new updated FAQ will show up; your example is good.
Your image is a good start, but not enough. What can be concluded from that? We don't see the motion of the plane (eh it's an image), we don't know what you're doing with the stick etc..
Do you understand that it impossible to change something on vague images or feelings?
It was not pejorative, what i wanted to say it is that you know Neoqb is listening (see the change list) but to change it is important to bring hard data and facts!
For example, People complain(ed) about camel being UFO, to maneuverable etc.. etc.. quoting MP experience; Most of them didn't know in MP many fly camels (and dR.I) with as low as 10% fuel; this changes completly the validity of the complain because in reality a 100% full camel is not an UFO at all.
This doesn't mean anything is perfect, it just means that a request has to be valid to be useful