30 replies to this topic

[Agent86]

Please give a reason for "no" votes
 2013_7_30__18_12_2 copy.jpg   614.15KB   775 downloads
 2013_7_30__18_12_20 copy.jpg   701.46KB   774 downloads
 2013_7_30__18_13_7 copy.jpg   295.1KB   774 downloads

Dowload Here

[oneeyeddog]

Very nice Agent! I vote Yes.

[=HillBilly=]

Cool skin,how do you spell no?
Just kidding I voted yes.

[Agent86]

Thanks guys, as I have explained before there is Always a "no" vote almost immediately upon posting a poll.
Even when asked to please let us know why the "no" vote, we get no answer……maybe they cant read and are just looking at the pictures ?

[Cybermat47]

I don't like the Mortal Kombst dragon on the fuselage…

But it's still a good skin.


YES!

[Agent86]

Thanks Cybermat, I do appreciate your opinion AND your yes vote
I didnt know that it was a mortal kombat dragon…..I found the clip art ages ago and I collect "Dragons" so there it is

[FlyingShark]

I like it, Yes.

[ChiefRedCloud]

I voted yes …. has class and good color …

[Pip2]

Me gusta <3

[Agent86]

Thanks Guys

[JB_Books]

A big Yes, class.

P.S.Wow 5 no s and none had balls enough to say why??? It takes all kinds.

[Dressedwings]

I don't think complaining about no votes is necessary.

I can say I said no because of the red. It seems rather bright, and on the wing tips sort of out of place, as its rather 'bland'

Also is that the MK dragon? Or something close?


Anyways the skins not bad, or close to bad, its just personal irks.

[Agent86]

Thanks for the explanation for your "no" vote "wings" . That's all I asked for in the poll. Everyone has different taste. I assume you don't like the iconic "red Barron" skin either….Lot of red there And a bit brighter as well In any case, thanks for letting me know why you voted no. I appreciate your coming forward with a reason. Thanks again

AND Thank you Mr. Books for the "yes" vote

[Philemmett]

ChiefRedCloud,
You always told everybody your were color blind. You must have had some miracle surgery. Well done! =NFF=Patriarch

[RAC_Shnoze_Shmon]

Thanks guys, as I have explained before there is Always a "no" vote almost immediately upon posting a poll.
Even when asked to please let us know why the "no" vote, we get no answer.

Probably making up for a lack of something.


Need to get to these votes with my automatic yes more often.

These are personal paints. The only legitimate reasons to vote against them is because there is an actual problem to be corrected or it has something vulgar, grotesque, or otherwise highly offensive to a sensible person.

This is the clothing somebody want's to wear, Your not being asked to wear it. And BTW you can stop it from showing up on your monitor in a number of ways without interfering with the ability of others to enjoy it.

[Agent86]

Well put Shnoze ! And thanks !

[Dressedwings]

Thanks guys, as I have explained before there is Always a "no" vote almost immediately upon posting a poll.
Even when asked to please let us know why the "no" vote, we get no answer.

Probably making up for a lack of something.


Need to get to these votes with my automatic yes more often.

These are personal paints. The only legitimate reasons to vote against them is because there is an actual problem to be corrected or it has something vulgar, grotesque, or otherwise highly offensive to a sensible person.

This is the clothing somebody want's to wear, Your not being asked to wear it. And BTW you can stop it from showing up on your monitor in a number of ways without interfering with the ability of others to enjoy it.

In some ways I agree with you, in others, I dont. Its all up to perception. Any symbol can be found offensive. I know a newspaper had to remove an image of a puppy because a group found it offensive. A few weeks ago some people found my EIII skin very ( I repeat VERY) offensive, while others thought that it definitely could have been time plausible.

I voted no because I would have liked to see a different shade of the red… thats it. This skin is good, but I would definitely change my vote with some things cleared up. Like I said, the skins great, but my personal taste tells me naw ah.

Hope thats slightly understandable.

[RAC_Shnoze_Shmon]

Why I included the caveat "to a sensible person"

[Ezrie]

Why I included the caveat "to a sensible person"

…Then why vote at all?



I've seen much better work from you,and the use of the Mortal Kombat Dragon could be construed as plagiarism.

"no"

[=HillBilly=]

People calling this dragon a Mortal Kombat Dragon needs to pull heads out and compare the two,close BUT NOT the same.

[Dressedwings]

Yeah I googled it myself. Its not the same but very close.

[Agent86]

People calling this dragon a Mortal Kombat Dragon needs to pull heads out and compare the two,close BUT NOT the same.

Some folks just cant manage that task
 ButtHead.jpg   31.85KB   285 downloads

[Louvert]

.

I like the skin 86, in particular I appreciate that you gave it some weathering and dulled things down a bit. As to any similarities to the Mortal Kombat Dragon, either real or perceived, not to worry. This is 1917, you'll be able to sue them.

.

[KrossKut]

Newbie here…seems to me the OP asked for why the no votes, then complains at the response?

Konfused by this…

[RAC_Shnoze_Shmon]

Why I included the caveat "to a sensible person"

…Then why vote at all?

For the fictional skins a plain up down vote is an unfortunate system of inclusion.

It would be better if it were based along the lines of innocent until proven guilty.

In other word passed unless good cause can be shown for rejecting.

Good cause being things such as there is a problem with the paint in game that must be fixed. There is something indecent, profane, grotesque or vulgar in the paint written or pictured.

Those are things that shouldn't require enough votes to stop.


On the other hand votes against a paint "because I have a hangnail, I don't like that particular shade of color, I want to feel superior and squash someones hard work, They used an image of a smurf or a Department of Transportation logo, I don't like that guy, I feel like saying no.
Votes like these should not be allowed to determine if someone's hard work is accepted or not. Requiring an objection to show good cause would eliminate this pettiness.

Unfortunately, it's the petty, those that have a stake in any paints, and the curios that show up to vote on them. Thus giving weight to unreasonable voices.

I don't like anything to do with Mortal Kombat, I don't like certain shades or red mixed with certain shades of yellow, I don't like the peace symbol, or cabbage patch dolls. But if somebody wants to put them on their personal paint I would not give consideration to trying to stop them over personal preferences. I might choose to shoot said peace symbol in the servers by flying opposition, but I won't refuse to let said symbol be on someone's paint.

What if 50 people get together and decide to present and vote for a paint that has profanity on it? Or genitalia? Or a picture of a toilet full of diarrhea? Are we to be set upon by this filth because only 47 sane people were aware and voted against it?


What if 50 people get together and decide to boycott a person, a group, or even the whole community from getting to use their desired paints?

This is an insidious flaw that should be rethought.

[=HillBilly=]

Why I included the caveat "to a sensible person"

…Then why vote at all?

Or a picture of a toilet full of diarrhea?

Now that would be befitting to some on this forum.

[B24_LIBERATOR]

I voted no because I prefer personal skins to resemble WW1 aircraft and not a Hotwheels car

[Agent86]

Newbie here…seems to me the OP asked for why the no votes, then complains at the response?

Konfused by this…

Just to be clear "Kut" the OP has not complained once……I appreciate ALL feed back, whether yay or nay.

[Agent86]

Good point Lib…..Like I said, everyone has different taste. Thanks for posting your reason for a "no". Hope to shoot at ya soon

[Agent86]

.

I like the skin 86, in particular I appreciate that you gave it some weathering and dulled things down a bit. As to any similarities to the Mortal Kombat Dragon, either real or perceived, not to worry. This is 1917, you'll be able to sue them.

.

LOL Thanks Louvert,
I have a panel of lawyers on alert

[Panthercules]

Poll concluded; thread locked.