Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Will Your System Run Rise of Flight?


  • Please log in to reply
203 replies to this topic

#41 skline00

skline00
  • Posts: 35

Posted 21 May 2012 - 19:03

I want to go for the GTX680/670 or HD7970 range, only the best for RoF. Only I do not know if 2Gb will be sufficient for a single 2560x1440 high resolution screen.
WHAT?????????? I am running 3 1920 x1080 monitors at 5760 x 1080 at high settings with outstanding fps on a single GTX 680. For a single monitor even at 2560 x 1440 it is Plenty!
  • 0

5960x-4.4-EK Sup evo|AsusRE5|16g DDR4-2133|EVGA GTX980TI SC-EK Blk|2 Smsng 850 EVO 500gb ssds Raid 0; 2 Tb WD Blk|Win10-64|PC P&C 1200W|Thrmltake X9|2 D5s in series-3 XSPC RX480s|Dell U3415W


#42 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 21 May 2012 - 22:00

Yes, that resolution is not quite as crazy as triple screens, it will do fine on 2 GB vram.

That's a good pairing though, I think its kind of silly to waste the power of a 680 or 7970 on a 60hz 1080P monitor, make it work a little more with a 2560x1440 or see the 120+ frames it can actually deliver on a 120hz monitor. Otherwise you are just spending cash on future proofing your computer for more demanding games that aren't even out yet.. That or you really LOVE super sampling. :)
  • 0

#43 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 22 May 2012 - 06:48

I want to go for the GTX680/670 or HD7970 range, only the best for RoF. Only I do not know if 2Gb will be sufficient for a single 2560x1440 high resolution screen.
WHAT?????????? I am running 3 1920 x1080 monitors at 5760 x 1080 at high settings with outstanding fps on a single GTX 680. For a single monitor even at 2560 x 1440 it is Plenty!
How many Vram are you using with settings at max?
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#44 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 22 May 2012 - 07:00

Yes, that resolution is not quite as crazy as triple screens, it will do fine on 2 GB vram.

That's a good pairing though, I think its kind of silly to waste the power of a 680 or 7970 on a 60hz 1080P monitor, make it work a little more with a 2560x1440 or see the 120+ frames it can actually deliver on a 120hz monitor. Otherwise you are just spending cash on future proofing your computer for more demanding games that aren't even out yet.. That or you really LOVE super sampling. :)
Are you saying that a cheap HD7870 would do the job also on max? Just curious because in 2009 I got the best single core GPU from AMD the HD4890-1gb and was thinking this could last a life time for RoF and OFF3 the only games I did play in 2009. Now only RoF BTW.

I will not play multi screens because I do not have the space for it on my flight desk and the bezels are irritating me.
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#45 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 22 May 2012 - 09:37

Depends what you mean by 'max'. How much anti-aliasing do you plan to use? and also so we are clear I am talking about 1080P at 60hz, not 2560x1440 or 120hz.

I am fairly certain that a 7870 will run 8X Multi-Sampling and probably get close to constant above 60 fps at 1080P, which is all the frames you can see on a 60hz monitor (My now dated 6970 does not have a problem doing this most of the time). If super-sampling is a must for you, I would guess it can do basic 2x and get 60fps, maybe 4x but I am not so sure for either setting since I have not used one.

$340 for max detail and 60 noticeable frames a second sounds like a better deal than $500 for max detail and 60 frames a second doesn't it?
  • 0

#46 SYN_Bandy

SYN_Bandy
  • Posts: 2599
  • LocationWishing I was in the La Cloche

Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:52

A 560Ti 2 GB card (well under $300 now, and very overclockable) gives me max detail at stock speeds and I do not notice any FPS drop, but I do not monitor FPS either. Kind of a "what I don't know won't hurt me" attitude. Keeps savings in my bank account too.

Now what I said in another post, sure would like to know what supersampling looks like though!
Maybe someday…
  • 0

#47 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 26 May 2012 - 05:39

Thanks for all the reply's here, seems that a secound hand HD6970-2Gb [euro 200,-] could also do the job fine on 2560x1440. Right inhere?
If so this will save my wallet, noticing even the HD7950/GTX670 will cost some euro 350,-
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#48 Morania

Morania
  • Posts: 5
  • LocationNortheastern NC

Posted 27 May 2012 - 03:40

Turns out that this game told on my machine. The last game that forced an upgrade for me was Microprose's B17. Worth it then and from the game play I have in this game it'll be worth it now.
  • 0

#49 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 27 May 2012 - 06:36

Dutch do you mean a 6790 or a 6970? There is a big difference there.
  • 0

#50 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 27 May 2012 - 07:04

The single core GPU 6970-2gb. Would like to know if this is sufficient, Second hand HD6950 unlocked to a HD6970 will cost me some 175,- a real HD6970 some 200,- euro's. I hate to put in extra euros if not needed.
So if a GTX6xx/HD79xx is not needed here it will save me a lott of euro's. Only it seems lott of improvements are doing to the coastal map hope this will not lead to more GPU power.
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#51 navair2

navair2
  • Posts: 1467
  • LocationIllinois, USA

Posted 27 May 2012 - 18:42

HD 6970 2gb will be more than sufficient Dutch. In fact, a 2 year old HD 5870 would even do a magnificent job of it.
  • 0

Case: Corsair 650D Motherboard: AsRock Z77 Extreme4 PSU: Antec TruePower New 750 Blue CPU: Intel i5-2500K ( Socket 1155 )

CPU Cooler: ZalMan CNPS9500A LED GPU: EVGA GTX 580 MEM: 8 GB G.Skill PC12800 DDR3 1600
Soundcard: Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Monitor: Samsung 2343 BWX 23"@ 2048 x 1152 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


#52 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 28 May 2012 - 03:19

Dutch, I am running a 2GB 6970 and I pretty much run RoF maxed out with 4X or 8x Multi-Sampling. I guess I have grass on medium instead of high because it dipped into the low 40's or high 30's at times close to the ground, and that is too low frames for my liking. Super-Sampling I could get away with 2X at high altitude but once you get close to the ground it dips into the high 30's and I don't find that adequate. Everything else is maxed out. Resolution is 2048x1152.

If this is okay with you, you could save a bunch of money by getting a 2GB 6950 or 6970, especially if you have success unlocking the 6950 to 6970 specs. The big question is how demanding will the Channel map be? It might run really similar to the current maps, it might be much better if you are far enough over the ocean, or it might be more detailed over the land areas and have higher resolution textures, knocking frames down, we don't know.

If you want to get very close to max detail with an average of 70 frames a second with frames in the 40's at low altitude with the game in its current state you could go with a 6900 series card or a 7850, you could get something that runs pretty decent with some settings turned down with a 5870, 6850 or 6870, cheaper than that. Or if you are worried about future proofing and want something that has ample frame rate at all times maxed out at 1080p you could get a 7870, 7950 or GTX 670.

I'm pretty sure that a 7870 would do everything maxed in RoF at 1080p, making a 7950 or GTX 670 somewhat wasteful at single monitor and 60hz, though I don't know for sure obviously. I would also like to find someone who plays RoF with a 7850 and see how that performs compared to a 6970 since they seem to be in similar price vs performance category. If a 7850 performs a little bit better than a 6970 in RoF, it would be hard to argue against that card. [EDIT: After looking up some info it appears a 7850 would not be faster than a 6970 and probably a 6950 in almost all situations.]

It really just depends on how much the extra performance is worth it to you in RoF, you could potentially get a 6950 for 175 euro, unlock it to a 6970 and have only a couple things set slightly lower in the graphics options that are hard to see, have an unnoticeable frame rate loss and pay half as much as a 7950 or GTX 670.
  • 0

#53 AndyJWest

AndyJWest
  • Posts: 1284

Posted 06 June 2012 - 00:41

I've just assembled a PC out of various bits - including a motherboard that was rescued from a pile of rubbish left after a flat was cleared out - the tenant (a friend of mine) had died, and evidently the people clearing the flat didn't think it was worth anything. It took a bit of work, salvaging bits from (at least) two other dead computers, but I now have 'Mish-Mash', my unique zero-cost PC: :D

MoBo: Biostar GF8200C M2+
CPU: AMD Athalon II X4 620
RAM: 2 GB (there were 2 x 2 GB cards on the MoBo, but one seems to be duff)
GPU: NVidia GForce 9600 GT (1 GB RAM)
HD: 224 GB
OS: Ubuntu - probably the latest version 12.04 LTS, though I've currently got 11.04 installed - and of course Wine to run Windows games. I've no desire to run Windows otherwise.

The question is, will it run RoF, as a 'gunner' PC, for when I have friends over? The weak points are probably RAM, and the graphics card. I'm absolutely skint at the moment, but at some point I'll no doubt upgrade the RAM. As for the graphics card, I'll just have to keep my eyes open - I'm reluctant to spend a lot of money on a PC built out of bits. If it won't run RoF, I won't be too disappointed - I'm sure it will run IL-2 '46, and possibly Silent Hunter 4, and of course it will use a lot less electricity than my gaming PC when I'm just browsing the forums etc.

Any thoughts? I will probably just try it and see anyway, but from looking at this thread, it looks just about possible.
  • 0

#54 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 06 June 2012 - 01:21

Nice pickup, sorry to hear about your friend.

I would think the processor is probably sufficient under most situations encountered in RoF, the graphics card and the memory might be a probably though. Still, try it out, turn down some detail and tell us what you find. :)
  • 0

#55 ChiefRedCloud

ChiefRedCloud
  • Posts: 2850
  • LocationWaleska, Georgia, USA

Posted 06 June 2012 - 02:18

For those NOT on the Technical side, kind of like me, here is an interesting sight —> CAN YOU RUN IT. It will require a small install and I have run it onmy machine with a check by NORTON which indicated that is ok. It does have Rise of flight listed in the drop down menu. And yes you have to put up with a wee bit of advertising ……

Attached Files


  • 0

G5fCmYF.png

NEW WINGS VIRTUAL FLIGHT TRAINING

"Hardcore Through Passion"


#56 huntertastic

huntertastic
  • Posts: 340

Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:15

hi Chief… kool find, i'm sure lots of others will find that site a great help :)
  • 0

#57 navair2

navair2
  • Posts: 1467
  • LocationIllinois, USA

Posted 06 June 2012 - 21:31

I've just assembled a PC out of various bits - including a motherboard that was rescued from a pile of rubbish left after a flat was cleared out - the tenant (a friend of mine) had died, and evidently the people clearing the flat didn't think it was worth anything. It took a bit of work, salvaging bits from (at least) two other dead computers, but I now have 'Mish-Mash', my unique zero-cost PC: :D

MoBo: Biostar GF8200C M2+
CPU: AMD Athalon II X4 620
RAM: 2 GB (there were 2 x 2 GB cards on the MoBo, but one seems to be duff)
GPU: NVidia GForce 9600 GT (1 GB RAM)
HD: 224 GB
OS: Ubuntu - probably the latest version 12.04 LTS, though I've currently got 11.04 installed - and of course Wine to run Windows games. I've no desire to run Windows otherwise.

The question is, will it run RoF, as a 'gunner' PC, for when I have friends over? The weak points are probably RAM, and the graphics card. I'm absolutely skint at the moment, but at some point I'll no doubt upgrade the RAM. As for the graphics card, I'll just have to keep my eyes open - I'm reluctant to spend a lot of money on a PC built out of bits. If it won't run RoF, I won't be too disappointed - I'm sure it will run IL-2 '46, and possibly Silent Hunter 4, and of course it will use a lot less electricity than my gaming PC when I'm just browsing the forums etc.

Any thoughts? I will probably just try it and see anyway, but from looking at this thread, it looks just about possible.

Sorry, missed this post last night as I was playing Silent Hunter III. ;)

Andy, I believe the machine you've built will run Rise of Flight, but because of the 9600 GT and the fact that it only has 2gb of RAM those two factors will hamper things a bit. As Scott has suggested, turn down some things and let us know how it runs…the framerate killers like Landscape, Reflections, Shader Quality and Shadows can be adjusted to help. Also, you'll have to reduce other settings due to the graphics card being a bit weak ( a 9600 GT is just a bit weaker than the minimum recommended card, the 9800 GT ) such as AA ( anti-aliasing ), AF ( anisotropic filtering ) and others that would make the card work hard.

My guess? That system will probably run with mostly low to medium settings, not much more.

Best wishes. :S!:

* Scott, is that a Junkers D.I in your sig bar flying over Rise of Flight landscape? Tell me you found a way to sneak one into the game… 8-)
  • 0

Case: Corsair 650D Motherboard: AsRock Z77 Extreme4 PSU: Antec TruePower New 750 Blue CPU: Intel i5-2500K ( Socket 1155 )

CPU Cooler: ZalMan CNPS9500A LED GPU: EVGA GTX 580 MEM: 8 GB G.Skill PC12800 DDR3 1600
Soundcard: Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Monitor: Samsung 2343 BWX 23"@ 2048 x 1152 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


#58 gavagai

gavagai
  • Posts: 15541

Posted 06 June 2012 - 22:03

A 9600GT can run RoF just fine. That was the first card I had for RoF, and after I gave it to a friend, he now has it in his second computer after upgrading. This cpu is some sort of AMD black edition quad core, with 4gb ram and windows 7 (64 bit), and with the 9600GT it ran RoF surprisingly well. Just turn off post effects, set terrain to medium, and turn off reflections. 4x AA and 8x Anisotropic filtering were completely useable.
  • 0

#59 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 07 June 2012 - 08:45

* Scott, is that a Junkers D.I in your sig bar flying over Rise of Flight landscape? Tell me you found a way to sneak one into the game… 8-)

I found this sometime last year. Apparently it is a screenshot from an unreleased build that had the early workings of a D.I, though it doesn't look too shabby to my eyes! I heard it was put on hold or abandoned (I hope not) because of limitations with ROF's damage modelling. This is off topic though, I suppose it's for another thread.
  • 0

#60 VonSensburg

VonSensburg
  • Posts: 115

Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:14

* Scott, is that a Junkers D.I in your sig bar flying over Rise of Flight landscape? Tell me you found a way to sneak one into the game… 8-)

I found this sometime last year. Apparently it is a screenshot from an unreleased build that had the early workings of a D.I, though it doesn't look too shabby to my eyes! I heard it was put on hold or abandoned (I hope not) because of limitations with ROF's damage modelling. This is off topic though, I suppose it's for another thread.

Offtop2: I would love to see this plane as it's a 1940's plane in 1918! Hugo Junkers was real visioner.
  • 0

#61 SYN_Bandy

SYN_Bandy
  • Posts: 2599
  • LocationWishing I was in the La Cloche

Posted 08 June 2012 - 08:44

Offtop2: I would love to see this plane as it's a 1940's plane in 1918! Hugo Junkers was real visioner.
Well, 1930's maybe… :D
  • 0

#62 realCallahan

realCallahan
  • Posts: 2070

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:03

Navair,
I got a question about free space for ROF.
Sorry if its a dumb question, but how much free space on my hard drive is perfect for ROF?
And why do some guys here got so amazing graphics and realistic settings?
Im not well known about Computers and so on, perhaps somebody can help me?

Regards,
Callahan
  • 0

#63 navair2

navair2
  • Posts: 1467
  • LocationIllinois, USA

Posted 08 June 2012 - 21:22

Mr. Callahan,

My Rise of flight folder is currently sitting at 22.4gb, and I don't even have half the skin packs installed…I personally recommend at least 30gb if you plan on installing it with all the skin packs and other mods.

As for graphics settings and your PC's capabilities, it might be best if I knew your "specs"…go into Windows "Control Panel", then click on the icon marked, "System" and tell me a few things:

1) Processor manufacturer and model
2) Installed RAM
3) Operating System
4) Your graphics card or type. The exact model and amount of VRAM ( 512mb, 1gb etc. )


:S!:
  • 0

Case: Corsair 650D Motherboard: AsRock Z77 Extreme4 PSU: Antec TruePower New 750 Blue CPU: Intel i5-2500K ( Socket 1155 )

CPU Cooler: ZalMan CNPS9500A LED GPU: EVGA GTX 580 MEM: 8 GB G.Skill PC12800 DDR3 1600
Soundcard: Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Monitor: Samsung 2343 BWX 23"@ 2048 x 1152 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


#64 Private-Cowboy

Private-Cowboy
  • Posts: 140

Posted 08 June 2012 - 21:50

Why is yours so big? Mine is pretty much 8GB. The planes are all in there so it doesn't matter how many you buy. I have not installed a skin pack yet but what should grow it beyond 10GB?

As for graphics I was surprised how well RoF performs on my machine. It was never designed for games but for serious work (Photoshop and such). I have a IvyBridge 3570k (not overclocked yet), 16GB DDR 1600, Samsung 830 128GB SSD and ATI 6870. I can max out the settings easily and get silky smooth 35-50fps. The only thing I can't use is supersampling. And my screen res is FullHD 1920x1080. To cut a long story short, RoF is significantly less demanding than I had thought and runs MUCH better than FSX for example.

One thing that seriously boost framerate is VirtuMVP. I kinda kombines the dedicated graphics (ATI 6870 in my case) with the iGPU (HD4000 in my case) - like running multi-GPU utilizing the iGPU instead of two dedicated GPUs. After all I only paid around 150 Euros für my 6870 and the iGPU is there anyway if I want it or not, so I might as well put it to use. One great feature of VirtuMVP is, that it prevents tearing (like having VSync on) but without the input lag. Came free with the mainboard and works surprisingly well for me.
  • 0

#65 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 09 June 2012 - 05:26

Then show us your catalyst and Rof graphic printscreens, so we can check what we do wrong here??
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#66 realCallahan

realCallahan
  • Posts: 2070

Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:31

Mr. Callahan,

My Rise of flight folder is currently sitting at 22.4gb, and I don't even have half the skin packs installed…I personally recommend at least 30gb if you plan on installing it with all the skin packs and other mods.

As for graphics settings and your PC's capabilities, it might be best if I knew your "specs"…go into Windows "Control Panel", then click on the icon marked, "System" and tell me a few things:

1) Processor manufacturer and model
2) Installed RAM
3) Operating System
4) Your graphics card or type. The exact model and amount of VRAM ( 512mb, 1gb etc. )


:S!:

Ill send you that stuff via PM as soon as I can Sir,
thank you again! :S!:
  • 0

#67 neuro

neuro
  • Posts: 1523

Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:13

GT9800 and GTS250 both *do* run RoF at medium-high settings on Core2 Quad. Confirmed by one of my squad mates.
  • 0

#68 Private-Cowboy

Private-Cowboy
  • Posts: 140

Posted 09 June 2012 - 18:38

Then show us your catalyst and Rof graphic printscreens, so we can check what we do wrong here??

I don't know what you are doing wrong but here are the requested sceens. I don't use the CCC but ATItray instead (has much better configuration options and allows undervolting).

ATItray settings …

Image

Image

ROF Launcher settings …

Image

As you can see the settings are all set towards best possible image quality. Without the limiter I get 30-35fps on the ground and 40-50 in the air. I limited to 30 and that limit is always hit. I've not seen it dip below the limit no matter what happened on the screen. I limit the fps because I notice framerate fluctuations more than a steady 30. And steady 30 are pretty much all you can ask for in a flight sim like this. Why would you wan more. Limiting also has the effect that my card barely gets warm. I've yet to see more than 55°C on the GPU with the limit set to 30.

It runs really well and I'm kinda surprised that it does perform so nicely. Maybe IvyBridge with it's HD4000 iGPU does kick the engine into overdrive. :x
  • 0

#69 Dutch2

Dutch2
  • Posts: 4367

Posted 09 June 2012 - 20:34

More a less the same as I have, only set AA to 8x and FPS limiter to off, because it will not go higher then 61FPS. HDR=off, only raindrops checked and light sources to max.

Could ATItool a try only I see the last version is from 2006??
http://www.techpower...eaking/ATITool/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.techpower...eaking/ATITool/
  • 0
If I wrote something in this forum that is hurting or abuse a member, organisation or country? Let me know by pm for the corrections, please do not react back by bashing/trolling/flaming or other personal attacks!

Yep I’m an 2009 Rof pre-order buyer and one of the few that did buy the Sikorsky game.

#70 Private-Cowboy

Private-Cowboy
  • Posts: 140

Posted 10 June 2012 - 12:30

That is the "ATI Tool", I mean the "ATI tray tool". Those are different tools. The tray tool can be found here …

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=733

and is recent as of 2011-11-04 and supports new Catalyst versions too. The reason I prefer it over CCC is that it is much less heavy (less RAM consumption for its process, less MB on the harddisk) and allows much deeper customizations. It allows you to overclock higher then CCC does and allows you to change voltage too. It's not as pretty as CCC but much more useful.

It also comes with a great OSD that overlays the game you play with the details you want to see (framerate, gpu temperature, fan duty cycle, …). Thats quite useful for finding the sweet spot of thing.
  • 0

#71 SYN_Bandy

SYN_Bandy
  • Posts: 2599
  • LocationWishing I was in the La Cloche

Posted 10 June 2012 - 12:38

Make sure AA and AF are 'application controlled' in either ATI Tray, CCC, or nVidia equivalent.

There is no need to have another layer of either AA or AF if it is enabled in RoF, and having RoF do it means that it will be done as each frame is rendered from runtime. It doesn't get any better than that for performance….
  • 0

#72 gargouet

gargouet
  • Posts: 21

Posted 14 July 2012 - 15:49

I am fairly certain that a 7870 will run 8X Multi-Sampling and probably get close to constant above 60 fps at 1080P, which is all the frames you can see on a 60hz monitor (My now dated 6970 does not have a problem doing this most of the time).
That's what I expected to before I owned 7870 (2GB VRAM). I have a 60hz monitor too and I rarely get 60 fps, especially on MP servers where it can fall under 30 fps in dogfights.
Several assumptions (including absurds ones :lol: ) to explain that :
1. My CPU (i7 860 socket 1156) is ageing or bad adjusted in BIOS ?
2. Catalyst control center (v 12.6) is bad adjusted ? How to set morphological filter, antialiasing filter (standard or edge detect), anisotropic filter, tesselation, catalyst AI, vertical sync, antialiasing mode and triple buffering ?
3. My 23 inches monitor is definitely inappropriated for gaming (no HDMI, IPS and 8ms) ? DVI port is not appropriated too.
4. my silent master 600W is insufficient
5. My ageing trackIR 3 (or software version 4.1.028) influences frame rates
6. Everything has to be set on low or med in ROF launcher. Check/uncheck multi GPU, V sync…? Which settings are FPS killer here ?
7. 7870 is an unpowerded and sucky card (for ROF at least) ? Need to overclock it ?
Well, I need some ideas to solve this riddle…
Thanks for help :S!: .
  • 0

#73 navair2

navair2
  • Posts: 1467
  • LocationIllinois, USA

Posted 14 July 2012 - 17:05

Captain,

I'll give you a break-down on your system by components to help narrow down the problem:

1) The Intel i7-860 quad-core is plenty powerful enough for Rise of Flight, and for probably all of todays current games and other applications. It is a strong quad-core and by no means aging or badly adjusted IMO. This is a benchmark based on Rise of Flight's recommended requirements citing a Core2 Quad 2.6ghz compared to your processor: http://www.anandtech...oduct/89?vs=108" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.anandtech...oduct/89?vs=108

2) Catalyst Control Center or other driver adjustments: I can't help with due to my unfamiliarity with ATI / AMD cards in general, at least as far as CCC goes.

3) I'm not sure which 23 inch monitor you have, but not having an HDMI port or it not being an IPS ( the best and most expensive panel type ) does not mean you cannot enjoy ROF…I have a 23 inch Samsung TN with a 5ms response time and it handles ROF just fine. http://www.pchardwar...panel-types.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.pchardwar...p.com/guides/lc … -types.php

4) Your Cooler Master Silent Pro 600 watt PSU will do the job very well ( especially with that HD 7870 ), unless you have dual graphics cards or are powering a server, in which case you'd need to step up to something in the range of 700-900 watts.

5) TrackIr3, I can't answer due to the fact I have never owned TrackIR…you may have a hardware conflict.

6) I can get into that later, but suffice to say, Supersampling is your biggest hitter, followed by Reflections and Landscape I believe. Keep a careful eye on how much memory you use as you adjust your settings. Anything over about 90% may have an adverse affect on how ROF runs.

7) That HD 7870 is a fairly powerful card: http://www.anandtech...duct/509?vs=548" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.anandtech...duct/509?vs=548 IMO, it's not the problem in itself.

I believe your problem to be strictly in your ROF Launcher settings…however, make sure you have at least 4gb of RAM. Other than that, this sounds like it could take a bit of time to work out.
  • 0

Case: Corsair 650D Motherboard: AsRock Z77 Extreme4 PSU: Antec TruePower New 750 Blue CPU: Intel i5-2500K ( Socket 1155 )

CPU Cooler: ZalMan CNPS9500A LED GPU: EVGA GTX 580 MEM: 8 GB G.Skill PC12800 DDR3 1600
Soundcard: Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Monitor: Samsung 2343 BWX 23"@ 2048 x 1152 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


#74 neuro

neuro
  • Posts: 1523

Posted 14 July 2012 - 20:58

Will Your System Run Rise of Flight?
Mine? Yes, it will.
:P
  • 0

#75 Scott_Steiner

Scott_Steiner
  • Posts: 789
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 14 July 2012 - 22:11

Captain, make sure you have super-sampling unchecked if you have the slider on 8x MSAA, make sure the multi-gpu box is unchecked. For now make sure vertical synchronization is left unchecked and frame-rate limiter is at unlimited. Make sure in CCC Anti-Aliasing is set to "use aplication settings". Make sure Anti-Aliasing mode is set to Multi-Sample AA and not to Super-Sample AA.

I just upgraded to 12.6 and those drivers work fine on a single card, not a problem there. It is doubtful the TrackIR 3 is causing hardware conflicts, I have a TrackIR 2 and have never had any conflicts with it.
  • 0

#76 gargouet

gargouet
  • Posts: 21

Posted 15 July 2012 - 12:22

I believe your problem to be strictly in your ROF Launcher settings…however, make sure you have at least 4gb of RAM. Other than that, this sounds like it could take a bit of time to work out.

Indeed, with everything set on low and post effect unactivated in ROF launcher, the game is completely ugly but I easily get 60 FPS, so ROF laucher settings are too high to run ROF with good frame rate. Reducing reflections and shaders quality (from "max" to "medium") give better results.


Captain, make sure you have super-sampling unchecked if you have the slider on 8x MSAA, make sure the multi-gpu box is unchecked. For now make sure vertical synchronization is left unchecked and frame-rate limiter is at unlimited. Make sure in CCC Anti-Aliasing is set to "use aplication settings". Make sure Anti-Aliasing mode is set to Multi-Sample AA and not to Super-Sample AA.
I left uncheck vertical sync in ROF launcher : seems to be smoother, even though I rarely get 60 FPS, but my screen looks like torn in large horizontal wide stripes with each head movement : tiring for eyes… should I uncheck vertical sync and triple buffering in CCC too ?
  • 0

#77 gavagai

gavagai
  • Posts: 15541

Posted 15 July 2012 - 12:51

Captain, when in doubt, keep it simple.

In the CCC:
1. Leave as many things as possible "application controlled."
2. Don't turn on morphological filtering, edge detect, or any of that other riff-raff.
3. Leave the anti-aliasing quality at multi-sampling.
4. You can leave texture filtering at "quality," otherwise there's no point in having RoF's detailed cockpits.

In the RoF launcher
Reflections, shadows, and shader quality are the big FPS killers. Start with medium settings for those and only increase when you're happy with performance. For example, with my 6870 I have reflections and shadows at medium, and shaders set to high.
Start with anti-aliasing at 4x. You'll hardly notice the difference from 8x, but the performance difference can be significant. If you get everything else where you like it, then you can try out 8x.

Now we can get back to doing more important things, like complaining about the game. ;)
:S!:
  • 0

#78 gargouet

gargouet
  • Posts: 21

Posted 15 July 2012 - 21:26

Thanks for help, pilots :S!:
  • 0

#79 realCallahan

realCallahan
  • Posts: 2070

Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:36

Er…
friends, read:
If I want to stage up the graphic settings, and I cant to em so high, I got to buy more main memory (ram), I got 2GB and I got to have more than 4, haven`t I?

Thx again,
Callahan
  • 0

#80 catchov

catchov
  • Posts: 3986

Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:43

Yep. A rig's gotta know its limitations Callahan.
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users